Which design is better? It depends!
As the weather in
the New England gets colder, we've been spending more week nights at the town's
library. My favorite section of the library is the northeast side of the second
floor filled with books on homemaking, art, and career. As a frequent visitor,
I'm hardly surprised by the surroundings here. But I was the other night.
As I was walking
down the aisle, I noticed a couple of unusual signs on the side of one book
shelve (Figure 1). They were eye-catching because they had pictures in them in addition to the
expected book section numbers. (First time in my life had ever noticed a
picture on the side of a library book shelve!
Anyone else in the same boat?) One picture had a puppy and a cat in it
pointing out the Pets Section. Another showed a pot of boiling spaghetti for
Cooking, obviously. And finally, the last one was a clipart with a man and a
woman in power suits hinting at the Career & Business Section.
Figure 1. A couple
unusual signs at the Morse Library. Notice the pictures and big font.
Figure 2. Regular book shelve signs at Morse Library. Nothing surprising.
To give you a sense
of how prominently these picture-enhanced signs stood out, compare them with a
regular sign below. Between the two flavors, three differences were obvious:
- New signs had pictures. Regular signs had none.
- New signs had section names. Regular signs did not.
- New signs showed section numbers in a huge font. Regular signs' numbers appeared tiny in comparison.
Now the question
was: why? (And notice the effort to hide the shiny surface that appeared to be
part of a tablet in between the new signs.) But I'm not going into that because
as much as I want to speculate, I haven't done any investigations and has nothing
to back up any hypothesis I may have.
Instead, as someone
who's constantly tuned into anything that may trigger interesting human
behaviors, I would ask the question: Which design is more usable? My invariable
answer to this question has been and will probably always be: It depends.
To illustrate why, consider the following scenarios.
Scenario 1: Frequenter. Exploring.
Jen is a foodie and
an avid cook. Her enjoys trying out new eateries around town and making
delicious dishes for her friends and family. Her local library is her source of
inspiration for fancy dishes. She recently finished the Little Paris Kitchen
cookbook by Rachel Khoo she got from the library. Today, she's returning for a
new cookbook. She doesn't have a specific book in mind. She's in the mood of
exploring and letting serendipity bring her something fun to check out. As a
frequenter to the library, Rachel goes straight for the shelves with cookbooks
that she remembers from numerous previous visits. She does not bother to look
at the signs on the bookshelves. She knows where she wants to go by heart.
Scenario 2: First-timer. Locating a book.
Aiden is new to
town. He has signed up for a pass at the local library a few weeks ago but
hasn't got a chance to leverage it.
During a recent
weekend visit to NYC, Aiden enjoyed an amazing dinner at the famous MOMOFUKU
restaurant by celebrity chef David Chan. The sticky rice with spicy sausage was
so good that he wants to create it on his own. He remembers that David Chan has
written a cookbook on the dishes served at his restaurant. When Aiden got home,
he looks up "David Chan" in the library's online catalog. The
MOMOFUKU cookbook came up. Excited, he writes down the call number and heads to
the library.
As a fresh visitor
to the library, Aiden asks for help locating the floor section. A librarian
directs him to the section. There, he starts looking for the matching shelve
number. He immediately notices the huge
shelf number and the picture of the boiling pasta. He checks the shelf number
above it to see if that matches his. It didn't. He continues to the next shelf
and did the same thing. This time, it did. He heads down that shelf and finds
the cookbook.
Which is design better? It depends.
The signs did not
help Jen. She walked past them as she did not need them. She was familiar with
the library section and was just browsing around.
The signs were
helpful to Aiden in the beginning. The huge shelf numbers and the pasta picture
immediately grasped his attention. But
eventually, he relied on the numbers, not the picture, to locate his book as
the cooking section spanned multiple shelves.
In summary, to
determine how good a design is, it really depends on who the users are, what their goals
are, and what they already know. Graphics
and pictures are often considered more "user friendly" than text
however, that is not necessarily so. If they do not serve users' goals well,
they are of little to no value.
Comments
Post a Comment